{"id":20782,"date":"2017-06-02T09:38:04","date_gmt":"2017-06-02T13:38:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wasteadvantagemag.com\/?p=20782"},"modified":"2017-06-02T09:38:04","modified_gmt":"2017-06-02T13:38:04","slug":"dep-demands-more-information-on-plans-for-bucks-county-hazardous-waste-site","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wasteadvantagemag.com\/dep-demands-more-information-on-plans-for-bucks-county-hazardous-waste-site\/","title":{"rendered":"DEP Demands More Information on Plans for Bucks County Hazardous Waste Site"},"content":{"rendered":"
Pennsylvania on Tuesday again delayed a controversial project that would recycle hazardous waste in Bucks County, saying that a permit application was incomplete.<\/p>\n
The Department of Environmental Protection said part of the application by Elcon, a processor of waste from industries including petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, had not submitted the required information in six categories, and so was \u201cadministratively incomplete.\u201d<\/p>\n
Officials asked the company to resubmit the application \u2013 the second part of a multi-phase process that seeks state approval for the plant \u2013 but did not set a time by which a new application must be made. The plan for a 70,000 square-foot recycling facility on a 22-acre site in Falls Township, Bucks County has been opposed by environmentalists who say that the plant would be too close to the Delaware River which could be endangered by any spill of contaminants, whether caused by human error or by flooding that results from climate change.<\/p>\n
\u201cDEP remains committed to the thorough, rigorous and transparent review of this application,\u201d said DEP Southeast Regional Director Pat Patterson, in a statement. \u201cThese are applications that can be very complicated, and I applaud our staff for ensuring that we have all of the information that we need before moving forward with a technical review.\u201d<\/p>\n
The company, based in Israel, made its first application to DEP in March 2014 when it sought approval for the location of its planned facility. That application was initially rejected on the grounds of insufficient information but was finally approved in November, 2015, allowing the company to move to the current phase, said Virginia Cain, a DEP spokeswoman.<\/p>\n
The latest document is not a denial, Cain said, but is seeking additional information on areas such as storm-water management; legal ownership of the land where the plant would be built, and geological information based on professionally accepted standards. Neither is the latest action an assessment of Elcon\u2019s proposed activities at the new plant, she said.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe\u2019ve returned the application, telling Elcon, \u2018You have to address these six deficiencies before you can resubmit the application,\u2019\u201d Cain said. If and when all the information is received, the DEP will then begin a 10-month technical review that will assess Elcon\u2019s proposed operations.<\/p>\n
Elcon officials could not be reached for comment on the DEP\u2019s latest decision, but the company\u2019s web site says that the proposed facility would be outside any wetlands; will not discharge into the Delaware River, and would be virtually free of airborne contaminants.<\/p>\n
The facility would not accept waste that is radioactive, or that comes from oil and gas fracking, according to the website.<\/p>\n
The project will create up to 200 construction jobs and some 175 permanent jobs in its first two phases, Elcon said. It argued that its presence as the first hazardous waste recycling plant on the U.S. East Coast would encourage more businesses such as pharmaceutical companies to locate nearby rather than shipping their waste hundreds of miles by rail or truck, as at present.<\/p>\n