China was once the world鈥檚 leading importer of recycled materials, but beginning in 2018 the country imposed stringent requirements on the recyclable materials it would accept and raised processing fees that triggered a sharp reduction in imports. The ripple effect has been severe. In the United States, many municipalities that relied on China are now sending materials recycled to more traditional waste disposal programs such as landfills and incineration.
A study conducted by researchers at the University of Georgia and published in the journal聽Science Advances聽found that since 1992 China imported approximately 106 million tonnes of plastic waste, equating to nearly half of the world鈥檚 plastic waste exports.
鈥淎bout 111 million metric tons of plastic waste is going to be displaced because of the import ban through 2030, so we鈥檙e going to have to develop more robust recycling programs domestically and rethink the use and design of plastic products if we want to deal with this waste responsibly,鈥� said Jenna Jambeck, associate professor in the University of Georgia鈥檚 College of聽Engineering and co-author of the study.
Making the situation more challenging in the United States is the structure of the nation鈥檚 recycling industry 鈥� a patchwork of state and municipal programs. There are few national laws or standards governing the industry. State and local governments have created residential pickup programs and formed partnerships with private businesses for the collection and processing of the waste. China鈥檚 disruptive decision has led many municipalities to suspend such programs or redirect how recyclable waste is disposed.
The current state of the recycling industry creates a daunting challenge for companies. Earlier this year the market research company Nielsen published data showing that 81 per cent of consumers said it was either 鈥渆xtremely鈥� or 鈥渧ery鈥� important that companies implement programs to improve the environment. Nielsen added that 73 per cent of global consumers said they 鈥渨ould鈥� change or 鈥減robably would鈥� change their consumption habits to reduce their impact on the environment.
鈥淐onsumers are thinking more deeply about what happened before their moment of purchase and what will happen to whatever packaging or聽other materials used in the product after they鈥檙e done using it,鈥� said Julia Wilson, director, global responsibility and sustainability for Nielsen, in a Feb. 7 webinar hosted by Nielsen.